🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women joined a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your content shows up in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The outcome was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Downside

Despite the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."