🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC race for mayor, political analyst Michael Lange issued a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into city data and voter surveys.

He published his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. In those areas, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored Cuomo, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added after that and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, it was possible where election day went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where the opponent was going to end up essentially increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did the mayor-elect gain additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved considerably with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump last year went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think it’s definitive, but I believe it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. The independent held Caucasian districts, affluent zones and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and residents all went for Cuomo. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from Eastern Europe in the borough, who were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Has Mamdani rewritten what the city means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left come from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America can have similar progressive hubs. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – because youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.